|
ECAI Session 3 - Where, when and why:
Time and Space in ResearchTime and Space in Research
Ian N. Gregory Chair
Karen Kemp, "Classifying time and space with GIS"
This paper outlines various approaches using geographical information
system technology to handle space and time. Specific methodologies are
determined by resources in terms of staff, time and core materials and
the research aims of a project.
Ruth Mostern and Michael Buckland, "Toward a Gazetteer Clearinghouse
for Distributed Historical and Cultural Content"
Specialized gazetteers are being developed on a wide range of historical
and cultural subject areas: from Chinese Buddhism, to classical Mediterranean
settlements, to Central Asian mountain passes, to administrative units
in Iran during the Sasanian empire. Gazetteers are an essential part
of an information architecture for time and place based research on
culture, offering the only way to link toponym-rich resources with map
displays. However, it is inconceivable that any single gazetteer will
be able to meet the needs of scholars working on diverse and sometimes
(to outsiders) abstruse research areas. For this reason, ECAI is developing
a clearinghouse of gazetteers that can be searched and used together.
This paper introduces some of the solutions and challenges raised by
that project. It will touch on the following areas: the need for generic
thesauri to map between feature types and named time periods in specialist
gazetteers, the development of both “best” and “minimally
acceptable” standards, management of multilingual content, and
requirements for IT architecture.
Merrick Lex Berman, "Integration of Multilingual Gazetteer Data"
Using several different historical map sources and datasets, the CHGIS
project has begun to integrate extracted features from these sources
into a single digital gazetteer. Practical observations on spatial and
temporal uncertainty, feature type scheme integration, romanization
and alternate names will be offered for the discussion.
David Bodenhamer, "Moving through Time"
Geographic information systems is well suited to handling movement
in space but not movement through time. This problem inhibits the use
of GIS by many scholars in the humanities and social sciences. What
are the fundamental problems that must be addressed for GIS to be a
preferred technology for these scholars and what are some potential
strategies for solving them? This paper also will suggest the epistemological
and methodological implications of these solutions for the humanities
and social sciences.
Ian Gregory, "Analysis in Space and Time"
One frequently stated advantage of GIS is its ability to analyse data.
In reality, GIS software has only very limited analytical capabilities
so users must devise their own means of analysing spatial and temporal
data within a GIS environment. This can be regarded as an opportunity
as, rather than relying on “off-the-shelf” solutions offered
by software vendors, researchers have to develop their own analytic
procedures. This is particularly true in the arts and humanities where
techniques devised in the earth and social sciences are unlikely to
be appropriate. Indeed, even the word “analysis” has different
connotations when crossing this divide. This paper presents a brief
overview of some of the principles that a researcher should bear in
mind when devising analytic methodologies in the arts and humanities.
|